Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Grace Piper vs Emma Wilson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Piper vs Wilson analysis and find out who is favored!
Grace Piper vs Emma Wilson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Piper 0 - 1 Wilson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Piper has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Wilson has won 46.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Piper, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wilson has won 56.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Piper has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wilson has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Piper has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Wilson winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Piper has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Wilson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 32/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Piper has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Wilson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Piper winning 0 times and Wilson being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Piper winning 1 and Wilson winning 2. The last match between Piper and Wilson was at the W25 Roehampton, 16-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Emma Wilson getting the victory 6-3 3-6 10-8.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Piper and Wilson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Piper winning 0 times and Wilson 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Piper winning 0, and Wilson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Piper has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Wilson has played against players with an average rank of 189.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Piper has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wilson has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Piper has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wilson has converted 44.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
880
Rank
803
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
23% (3-10)
Career Total W/L
51% (48-46)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Grace Piper vs Emma Wilson For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Piper VS Wilson
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Grace Piper | Emma Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (36/55) | 68% (49/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (21/36) | 63% (31/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 45% (25/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 10-8 |
Stats 
Emma Wilson
Player
Grace Piper
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Grace Piper | Emma Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (16/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (154/151) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 220 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (611/904) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (405/611) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (136/293) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (37/83) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (353/884) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Grace Piper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Grace Piper
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Grace Piper
38%
(
17 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Grace Piper
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-1 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Grace Piper
Player
Chloe Noel
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(3) 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Emma Wilson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Simpson
Player
Emma Wilson
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Lucia Cassidy
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Emma Wilson
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Chanel Janssen
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Elina Popescu
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Emma Wilson
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
69%
(
90 of
131)
7
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
3
90%
(
47 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
120
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lara Salden
Player
Emma Wilson
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Emma Wilson
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adithya Karunaratne
Player
Emma Wilson
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Piper Vs Wilson Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Piper are available here and Wilson photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
